You are currently browsing the archives for the blog category.
- ASD (3)
- augmentalist (5)
- bibliography (4)
- blog (6)
- change agents (6)
- community (16)
- concepts (8)
- connectivism (1)
- creativity (8)
- education (8)
- empowerment (3)
- ethics (1)
- feminism (1)
- flow (12)
- funding (2)
- Government policy (4)
- hype cycle (3)
- informal learning (24)
- lace (4)
- learning (28)
- methodology (6)
- motivation (13)
- narratives (3)
- ownership (5)
- planning (9)
- questions (5)
- reflections (12)
- research ideas (9)
- Second Life (19)
- self-directed learning (2)
- social learning (9)
- space/place (1)
- stuckness (5)
- threshold concepts (5)
- virtual environments (8)
- 02/03/2010: So much to do, so little time to do it
- 10/02/2010: Valuing learning
- 08/02/2010: Study on MS
- 25/01/2010: What am I doing at the moment
- 24/01/2010: Third places and hybrid spaces
- 22/01/2010: Not a blank canvas
- 10/01/2010: Feminist perspectives on learning in community
- 06/01/2010: Focus on learner or teacher
- 04/01/2010: Situated cognition
- 02/01/2010: Ideas coming together
Archive for the blog Category
Intrinsic and Extrinsic motivation and informal learning
04/11/2009 by lizit.
Spotted a couple of interesting blogs this morning. Steve Wheeler from Plymouth was responding to a blog from Tillman Swinke in Atlantis. Swinke is discussing personal learning and contrasting formal and informal learning and the role of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in each. He is basically saying that intrinsic motivation is more powerful than extrinsic and asking how the passion of intrinsically motivated informal learning can be incorporated into formal learning, suggesting social learning may be a way forward. (How I find myself wondering just what he means by social learning having seen the term used in so many different ways over the past months.)
Wheeler summarises Swinke’s blog and says that we begin to learn because we are interested - intrinsically motivated - but in formal education extrinsic motivation tends to take over as we seek to keep up with our peers, attain good enough grades, etc, and asks how interest and intrinsic interest can be/is maintained in formal learning. Wheeler then advocates PLEs as a way forward.
A commentator on Wheeler’s blog has pointed to the Futures of Education project which is asking questions about the redesign of education. This brings me back to another blog read this morning, Graham Attwell’s reflections on the use of computers in exams.
At root these posts are all raising some pretty fundamental questions about the nature of learning and education and the dichotomy between them. Others educate me, but I learn. Some of what I learn is guided by my teachers who share their passion for an idea or a subject area. Some of what I am taught is the use of essential tools to facilitate my learning - the 3 ‘R’s. Much of what I learn now is out of interest and desire to learn and explore ideas and play with them either in my mind or with my hands. Some of what I have been taught in the past, I am rediscovering through my own learning in the present.
Good thoughts to start the day!
Posted in social learning, informal learning, education, motivation, blog | Print | 1 Comment »
Reflecting on the last week
30/03/2009 by lizit.
Just finished a full week of conferencing. CAL last Monday to Wednesday and Best Practices in Education over the weekend in Second Life. Interesting participating in 2 such very different conferences and one f-t-f and one inworld. On a practical note, advantages of inworld are being able to do other things in between sessions, having a cup of tea when I want, being able to join in the chat channel, and not having to mess around with trains and stuff. On the other hand, it was nice to experience the buzz of the f-t-f, to meet people I had met before and make new contacts, and to discuss thoughts and reactions to the different speakers as it happened.
CAL is a general education conference. It drew a number of ‘big’ names and there was a lot of discussion of learning and education theory and practice. Somewhat disappointingly, there was not a lot said or demonstrated of current technologies. It is the only gathering I have been to recently where there wasn’t a hashtag for use in electronic media. It felt as though there were a lot of old debates continuing to be worked out. Having said that, I did meet some other folk actively involved in working in virtual worlds and we were ale to talk about what we are doing and the challenges we face. There was also a salutary reminder that not everybody sees or uses the virtual world the way I do; I found myself questioning the seamless integration of real and virtual advocated by one speaker with little evidence of using the affordances of Second Life. Unfortunately, he had to leave immediately after his presentation, but we did swap cards and I have contacted him asking for details of his blog on how to teach in SL. For me, the best session in the conference was Carina Garvin’s presentation of the work she has done on mapping SL affordances and pedagogy. This is a work in progress and Carina and I have agreed to keep in touch.
VWPBE was less intellectually challenging for me than CAL. There were many good presentations of different aspects of using Second Life in teaching and learning. Perhaps because the territory was more familiar, I was able to focus more on content and methodology. Although I had heard both Carina Garvin and Lisa Dawley present during the previous fortnight, it was good to hear their presentations again and to ‘hear’ things which I had not taken in first time round. Some brief notes on some of the other presentations I attended:
Joykadia is an international learning community drawing together a mixture of individual educators, students, organisations, and parents of younger students. The focus is on informality and activity. A number of ‘unconferences’ are held during the year. There is a major emphasis on community (Wenger), design and use of space, facilitation and recognising skills.
Devon Alderton spoke about the ethics of undertaking research in SL and reminded us that behind every avatar there is a person. Linden Labs ToS and Community Standards are very clear about no disclosure of personal IDs. IRB tends to focus on potential harm to research subjects, and may be phased by avatars and virtual worlds. Tom Boellstorf offers some useful guidelines, eg double blind avatar names, locked and encrypted storage, waiver for written consent of inworld subjects (written consent would mean revealing ID) and very clear explanations of what would happen.
The Theorists’ Project was advertised as teaching difficult concepts in SL and turned out to be a total learning experience developed by and with counseling and psychology graduate students. A fascinating place to visit and experience.
Jackie Darkstone (Jackie Marsh from Sheffield in rl) presented her work on literacy and ClubPenguin. I found this more interesting and meaningful having seen ClubPenguin. Hopefully she is sending a copy of a paper currently in press.
The DELVE project made two presentations based on different aspects of the current research project. Interesting for me to hear Shailey and Ahmad talking about what they are doing. Should be helpful with the work I am doing for the project!
Now the conferences are out of the way, I am hoping to be able to focus on doing some thinking and starting to pull some of my own ideas together and beginning to work out the way ahead!
Posted in community, blog, learning, Second Life, virtual environments | Print | No Comments »
ATC technical article
11/03/2009 by lizit.
Please sir, my avatar overslept…
Posted in blog | Print | No Comments »
“Anti-blog” blog revisited
27/01/2009 by lizit.
I have posted a fair bit of what is below as a comment, but I thought it probably merited a posting too as it was really useful getting that feedback and pointers in various directions.
Firstly, thanks for the comments. I think it did me good to get my thoughts off my chest - and also led to positive action in opening up this blog (OK I still have to approve the first posting for anybody and that seems to be a system thing that I can’t knock off). More importantly, it led me to looking at wikis again - thanks Carol for the pointer to yours - and I have now set one up and that is proving extremely useful for the kind of things I felt a blog wasn’t doing.
Yes, this blog really is a personal journal more than a public account. It probably is helping to keep me on track and helping to make me accountable.
I endorse what has been said about Plurk. Haven’t looked at Netvibes, but have been using Google Reader for quite a long time and if it ain’t broke why fix it!
I guess, like earlier discussions in other places about bibliographic tools, one of the important things on this DPhil journey is getting the different props in place for myself - and making sure they are tools which I personally feel comfortable with.With so many support resources available it is important to recognise that what one person finds useful, or how another expresses themself, is not necessarily what works best for me. There are tools I would now find it very difficult to survive without - yet not that long ago I did and didn’t realise I needed them - and other tools which I can happily take or leave (and more often than not choose to leave).
Currently my list of must have tools:
- Google reader - enables me to scan large amounts of stuff and decide what if anything to read in more depth
- Plurk - keeps me in touch with my friends and provides an awareness of the world out there, not only in my bit of the universe
- EndNote - now I am working out how to use it, it is keeping all the assorted reading I am doing accessible to me
- PBwiki - although still at an early stage is providing me with a place to organise myself and to pull lots of different stuff together
- This blog - jury still out, but it does have its uses if I am not using it for what I don’t want it to be
And tools I can survive without
- Twitter - just too much going on and too confusing for me
- Facebook - is it my age or is it that I just don’t get it
Guess that will do for now. Now to work out what I want/need to do today!
Posted in blog | Print | 1 Comment »
Procrastination
16/01/2009 by lizit.
Been pointed to an interesting article on procrastination this morning. It is a summary of a report of work by some German psychologists who were looking at procrastination in relation to concrete and abstract tasks. In short, the concrete tasks got done and some of the abstract ones never got done - even though all the volunteer participants were receiving payment on completion of the allocated task.
The suggestion is that thinking about abstract tasks more concretely - breaking down into smaller parts, etc, can assist in getting things done.
Looking at my ‘to do’ list, over the last week, it is true that the concrete tasks have been done, but the ones where I need to get brain in gear seem to be languishing and looking at me! Now I’m sure if I was feeling clever, I could relate this to motivation and flow…
Posted in motivation, blog | Print | No Comments »
Getting organised
13/01/2009 by lizit.
The comments on the last blog were very useful. Through Plurk, I have been put in touch with Carol Daunt Skyring and have been looking at her wiki which seems to make it possible to do the things I was complaining about not being able to do in a blog! I have now set up a wiki - very embryonic at the moment - and am already finding it useful as a repository for stuff. I suspect it may take over from OneNote in some ways, except OneNote does enable me to grab emails and webpages and scribble on them.
Will keep under review my use of the various tools and their pros and cons.
Posted in blog | Print | No Comments »